Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-3488-2017
IN T
227
Gurdev Singh
State of Punjab an
CORAM: HON
***** Present : Mr. for th
Mr. S ***** AMAN CHAUDH
1. Praye dated 31.05.2000 least the rates pre essentiality certific
2. The p his children, settle and on diagnose Debridement of ri examined by Gen Box Hill Hospital he was referred to Thereafter, as me under:- 7 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP
Date
Versus
and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN C ***** . Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punja ***** AUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition .2000 and directing the respondents to tes prescribed by the Government of certificates issued to the petitioner. The petitioner retired as JBT Teacher , settled in Australia where he suffere agnose, it came to be ‘Necrotizi t of right leg and foot to medial thig y General Practitioner at Eastern He ospital, Melbourne (Australia) and on rred to Alfred Hospital Melbourne in as mentioned in para 4 of the writ p
1
UNJAB & HARYANA ARH CWP-3488-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.01.2025
...Petitioner
...Respondents AN CHAUDHARY , Punjab. tition for quashing the Instructions ents to reimburse medical claims at ent of Punjab at AIIMS as per the eacher, had visited on tourist visa to suffered right leg pain and swelling crotizing Fasciitis and Extensive al thigh. Initially the petitioner was rn Health, Emergency Department, nd on finding the problem serious; ne in Australia as an ICU patient. writ petition, his treatment was as
ions s at the a to lling sive was ent, ous; ient. s as ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.15 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-3488-2017
3. The Instructions dated reimbursement to treatment having b
4. As is AIIMS rate, to w restricted his pray nor a decision the consider and decid fact that had the would have been counsel, on instru months. 5. The a
6. Dispo
14.01.2025 ashok
7 (O&M)
“Following arrival at Alfred Hyperbaric Oxygen Therap debridement with Vac dressin Saphenous veins and sural and during surgery. PICC line left self extubated after 5 days on ward pending transfer back to on last Vac change 06.10.2014 The sole premise of the rejection of dated 31.05.2000 (Annexure P6) ent to government employees/pension ving been taken from abroad.
As is apparent that since the aspect , to which learned counsel for the is prayer to it, has neither been ment ion thereon regarding the same taken d decide the claim afresh from the po the petitioner been in the country and been entitled to the medical reimbu instructions, states would be done in The aforesaid satisfies the learned cou
Disposed of accordingly.
Whether speaking
Whether reportable
2
Alfred ICU Patient, commenced Therapy, he had two further ressing of wound. Long and short ral and Saphenous nerves sacrificed ne left ACF inserted 03/10. Patient ys on ICU and was brought to the ack to Box Hill. Leg looking health .2014.” ion of the claim of the petitioner is P6) issued regarding the medical ensioners and their dependents for spect of even reimbursement at the the petitioner, on instructions, has mentioned in the said Instructions taken, it would be appropriate to the point of view taking note of the try and suffered the same illness, he eimbursement, which learned State in accordance with law within 4 ed counsel for the petitioner.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
ced ther hort iced tient the alth er is ical for t the has ions e to the
tate
ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.15 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document