- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35455 RSA No. 641 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.641 OF 2021 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA W/O NARAYANASWAMY D/O SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT 9TH CROSS, KARANJIKATTE KADLIPURA MAIN ROAD, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101. 2. SMT. VANAJAMMA W/O LATE JAYANNA D/O SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT BEGLIHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI KOLAR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT -563 102. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SRINIVASA T P, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ DODDAPPAJI, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, 2. SRI MUNENDRA S/O SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35455 RSA No. 641 of 2021 3. SRI M DEVARAJAPPA S/O SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT CHOWDENAHALLI VILLAGE, VOKKALERI HOBLI KOLAR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130. 4. SRI B S JOSEPH KUMAR S/O B SAMUEL, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.116 ‘KARUNA NILAYA’ BANGARPET ROAD KOLAR TOWN-563 101 5. SRI SRIRAMAPPA S/O MUNIBACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT MADERAHALLI VILLAGE VOKKALERI HOBLI KOLAR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAMAKRISHNA HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI A.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R2-MUNENDRA –SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 17.07.2025, THE APPEAL AGAINST R1 AND R3 IS DISMISSED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.12.2019 PASSED IN R.A.No.120/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.07.2018 PASSED IN O.S.No.203/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35455 RSA No. 641 of 2021 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Case called twice. None present on behalf of the appellants. Order sheet discloses that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal diligently. Sufficient time has already been granted. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Appeal is of the year 2021, yet to be admitted. 2. Taking note of these aspects of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR