M/S TIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS v. SMT R ANURADHA @ ANURADHA RAMES
WP/9691/2025 · 2025-10-25
Pradeep Singh Yerur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74041 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74041 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42415 WP No. 9691 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 9691 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S TIRUMALA CONSTRUCTIONS A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM OFFICE AT NO. 326, 5TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS, 4TH STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE - 560072 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS MR. MOHAN R AND MR. PRAVEEN M
2.
MR. MOHAN R S/O LATE RANGANATHAN AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
3.
MR. PRAVEEN MOHAN S/O MOHAN R AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 OFFICE AT NO. 326, 5TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS, 4TH STAGE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE - 560072
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHETHAN KUMAR K., ADVOCATE- ABSENT)
Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42415 WP No. 9691 of 2025
AND:
SMT R ANURADHA @ ANURADHA RAMES W/O R RAMESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 23, HIG A SECTOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, YALAHANKA, BANGALORE - 560064 REP BY HER SPA HOLDER AND HUSBAND SRI RAMESH R …RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION AS THE CASE MAY BE TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.02.2025 IN COM. EX. 588/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED LXXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-86) VIDE ANNEXURE-B., AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
ORAL ORDER
Order dated 15.09.2025 reads thus:
"Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non-prosecution."
In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuring days of the respective matters being given".
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42415 WP No. 9691 of 2025
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out today. It appears, the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15