Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 74032 (KAR)

SMT SUMA T v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/32211/2024 · 2025-12-05

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51470 WP No. 32211 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 32211 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUMA T WIFE OF VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DUMMI GOLLARAHATTI VILLAGE, HOLALKERE-TALLUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMAKRISHNA.N, ADV. FOR SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA., ADV.) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WOMAN AND CHILD WELFARE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001, Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51470 WP No. 32211 of 2024 2. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HOLALKERE TALLUK, HOLALKERE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577526 3. THE THAHSILDAR, HOLALKERE TALLUK, HOLALKERE CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526 4. SMT. LAKSHMI S. WIFE OF NAGRAJ T AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DUMMI, HOLALKERE-TALLUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577531 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3, SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T C, ADV. FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL SELECTION LIST DTD 15.11.2024 IN SO FAR AS THE R-4 IS CONCERNED AT SERIAL NO 17 OF THE LIST UNDER WHICH THE R-4 HAS BEEN SELECTED AS ANGANAVADI WORKER OF DUMMI GOLLARAHALLU -B ANGANAVADI CENTRE, DUMMIT VILAGE PRODUCE AT ANNX-G AND DIRECT THE R-2 TO ISSUE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51470 WP No. 32211 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to challenge Annexure-R1. 2. The memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB