[2025:RJ-JP:8669] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2394/2025 Arjun Nayak S/o Shri Ramavatar Nayak, Aged About 21 Years, R/o House No. 207, Benar Bhopaji Basti, Near Bhairu Mandir, Benar Road, Police Station Harmada, Jaipur. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.291/2024 registered at Police Station Shastrinagar, District Jaipur City (North) (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate for which maximum punishment is three years. Counsel submits that charges were framed against the petitioner on 06.11.2024 but till date, no prosecution witnesses have been examined. Petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2024 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:8669] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2394/2025] Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender and seventeen other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Arjun Nayak S/o Shri Ramavatar Nayak shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station till conclusion of the trial. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the [2025:RJ-JP:8669] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2394/2025] notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /181