RAHUL GAJANAN MORE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
WP/4603/2025 · 2025-11-21
Shri Shivkumar Dige
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74020 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 74020 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
909-4603-25 WP.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4603 OF 2025 Rahul Gajanan More ….Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra And Anr ….Respondents Mr. Vinay Kadam Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Nitin. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Chetan G. Patil for Respondent no. 2.
CORAM :
SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE :
21st NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this petition on the ground of keeping contention of petitioner open to argue on the point of admissibility of memo of dishonouored cheque at the time of final hearing of the complaint.
3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
4.
Contentions of both parties are kept open in respect of Iresh IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2025.11.26 13:53:33 +0530
909-4603-25 WP.DOC admissibility of memo of dishonouored cheque at the time of final hearing of the complaint.
5. Writ Petition is dismissed and disposed off in above terms.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Iresh