Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7400 (UTT)

OMVEER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1182/2021 · 2025-03-19

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1182 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that charge sheet has already been filed in the matter, after investigation, against the petitioner and which has now been challenged in an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 4. The said fact is accepted by the State. 5. In view of the statement so made, by counsel for the petitioner, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 19.03.2025 SK