Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73997 (KAR)

CV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. SRI. SHASHANK SHETTY. N

RP/389/2023 · 2025-12-03

Ravi V Hosmani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50821 RP No. 389 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REVIEW PETITION NO. 389 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. CV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 106-10-11-12, AMRUTHAHALLI, BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE P ANIL KUMAR JAIN. 2. SRI. BHARATH SUBBA RAO S/O VENKATARAMAIAH SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO. 106-10-11-12, AMRUTHAHALLI, BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092 3. SRI. SHASHIDHAR PAI S/O KOKKARNE SRINIVAS PAI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO. 106-10-11-12, AMRUTHAHALLI, BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50821 RP No. 389 of 2023 BANGALORE - 560 092 APPELLANTS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR SPA HOLDER P. ANIL KUMAR. 4. SRI. VINOD S MENON S/O SUDHINDHRA MENON AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO. 106-10-11-12, AMRUTHAHALLI, BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092. 5. MR. G. NANDEESH S/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO. 106-10-11-12, AMRUTHAHALLI, BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092. 6. MR. P. ANIL KUMAR JAIN NO. 106-10-11-12, AMRUTHAHALLI, BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIVEK HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SHASHANK SHETTY. N S/O LATE H.SURESH SHETTY AND LATE N. SWATHI RAI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50821 RP No. 389 of 2023 2. SMT. PRIYANKA SHETTY N S/O LATE H. SURESH SHETTY AND LATE N. SWATHI RAI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. C-1-103 RMV CLUSTERS, PHASE 1 DEVI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 094 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 09/11/2022 IN MFA NO. 3001/2022 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS AS MAY BE JUST. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners submits that during pendency of this Review Petition, main suit has been disposed of rendering this petition infructuous. 2. In view of said submission, Review Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20