Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7395 (JHR)

SONWA BASKE ALIAS SONUWA BASKE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1881/2025 · 2025-03-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1881 of 2025 ------ 1. Sonwa Baske @ Sonuwa Baske, Aged about 56 years, son of Somra Baske, R/o Village-Mahadeo Tand, P.O. & P.S.-Tisri, District-Giridih. 2. Sawna Baske, Aged about 43 years, Son of Bansi Baske R/o Village-Mahadeo Tand, P.O. & P.S.-Tisri, District-Giridih. 3. Rajesh Murmu, Aged about 39 years, Son of Bishun Murmu, R/o Village-Mahadeo Tand, P.O. & P.S.-Tisri, District-Giridih. 4. Kuwar Marandi @ Kubar Marandi, Aged about 46 years, Son of Baso Marandi, R/o Village-Kubri, P.O. & P.S.-Gawan, District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Govind Ray Karan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Forest Complaint Case No.96 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under sections 9, 39, 44, 48(a) & 51 of the Wild Life Conservation Act, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were found in the possession of bovine flesh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Forest Complaint Case No.96 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/