Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7395 (CHH)

SANJAY KUMAR RATHORE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/473/2025 · 2025-02-06

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6792 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 473 of 2025 Sanjay Kumar Rathore S/o Late Shri Jadbharat Rathore Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station Mulmula, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 2 -Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Disst.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Superintendent Of Police Janjgir-Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Station House Officer Police Station Mulmula, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 5 - Raja Sahu S/o Baratu Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Shiv Sahu S/o Chedu Sahu Aged About 51 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 7 - Pritam Sahu S/o Shiv Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 8 - Aman Sahu S/o Dauaa Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 9 - Dauaa Sahu S/o Lakshman Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 10 - Rajendra Rathore S/o Laxman Rathore Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 11 - Laxmi Sahu D/o Kaushal Prasad Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Sonsari, Police Station - Mulmula, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Singh Rathore, Advocate For State : Mr. G.L.Uike, Panel lawyer 2 Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 06.02.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime, contended that he wants to withdrawn the instant petition with liberty to file an application. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate forum. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the present petition is disposed of. sd/- Alfiza (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge