Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73944 (PNJ)

O K INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/18515/2024 · 2025-04-07

Arun Palli, Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-3955-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-18515-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.04.2025 O.K. Industries ….Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Anshuman Sethi, Advocate, Ms. Preeti Bansal, Advocate, and Mr. Arun Biriwal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms. Bharti, Advocate, for the respondent-AXIS Bank. **** ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 has shared with us a copy of the communication dated March 28, 2025, issued by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Gurugram Zonal Unit (retained on record as Mark X), and submits that bank account of the petitioner that was provisionally attached, under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, has since been restored. Accordingly, he submits that the petition be disposed of. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. AMIT KUMAR 2025.04.08 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Accordingly, the application is allowed, and hearing in the matter is preponed from 14.07.2025 to today, i.e. 07.04.2025. As prayed for, the petition is disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 07.04.2025 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMIT KUMAR 2025.04.08 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document