SOHAN LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
INCOMP/961/2026 · 2026-07-02
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7393 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7393 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
INCOMP-961 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Sohan Lal and another
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
1.
Khetarpal, file on 17.12.2025 objections.
2.
High Court Rules and Ord raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. On failure, the before the Court for orders.
3.
the Advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with per office report, message at registered mobile number of Clerk was also sent, however, nobody has come 961-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
INCOMP
Date of decision : Sohan Lal and another
Versus State of Haryana and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL None for the appellant. Mr. Pryavrat Parashar, AAG., Haryana **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. ( Oral ) The aforesaid appeal was filed on , Advocate. The Registry had raised certain objections on
17.12.2025. The same was not taken back for re objections. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, filed within a total period of 40 days. On failure, the before the Court for orders. A note was published by the Registry in the cause list, the Advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with per office report, message at registered mobile number of Clerk was also sent, however, nobody has come -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH INCOMP-961-2026 Date of decision : 02.07.2026
…….Appellant
...….Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Pryavrat Parashar, AAG., Haryana. was filed on 17.12.2025 by Sh. Sanyam Advocate. The Registry had raised certain objections on the case The same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana ers, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to filed within a total period of 40 days. On failure, the case is to be listed s published by the Registry in the cause list, whereby the Advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with objections. As per office report, message at registered mobile number of the Advocate/his Clerk was also sent, however, nobody has come forward. . Sanyam the case after removal of Haryana have been who filed it, to case is to be listed whereby objections. As the Advocate/his AJAY PRASHER 2026.07.02 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
INCOMP-961-2026 -2-
4. The instant case is shown in the cause list for today i.e. 02.07.2026, however, no one is present. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) July, 02, 2026
JUDGE Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2026.07.02 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document