GHULAM MOHAMMAD RATHER v. GHULAM MOHAMMAD RATHER AND OTHERS
CM(M)/98/2023 · 2025-08-25
Javed Iqbal Wani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7393 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7393 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No.35 Reg. No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 98/2023 GHULAM MOHAMMAD RATHER …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
GHULAM MOHAMMAD RATHER AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. I. Sofi, Advocate vice Mr. M. A Chashoo, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
O R D E R 25.08.2025
1. The instant part heard matter was taken up for further consideration in the first session, however, the counsel for the petitioner did not choose to appear.
2. Record of the proceedings would reveal that the counsel for the petitioner stands heard on 20.08.2025 and was posted for further
consideration on 21.08.2025, on which date the counsel for the petitioner did not appear and consequently the matter was posted for
consideration on 22.08.2025 on which date as well the counsel for the petitioner not choose to appear.
3. Today, the matter was yet again called in the second session, however, the counsel for the petitioner did not choose to appear again.
4. Under these circumstances, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
5. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 25.08.2025
“S.Nuzhat”