PANKAJ KUMAR AND 20 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9589/2025 · 2025-07-14
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73910 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73910 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115458 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9589 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar And 20 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The petitioners who are 21 in numbers have approached this Court by means of this writ petition with the prayer to direct the respondents-authorities to transfer the petitioners to the districts of their preferences as opted by them in their respective transfer applications, strictly in accordance with the Government order dated 23.05.2025 and circular dated 05.06.2025 and publication of vacancies. For ventilating of their grievances, they have moved several representations before the competent authority but nothing has been done till date.
Learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that she has no objection, in case, fresh representations are moved by the petitioners individually before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievance, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing
that
petitioners
may
make
fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 U.P. Basic Education Board, U.P., Prayagraj through its Secretary, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation
being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad