- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52707 WP No. 34018 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 34018 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUKANYA M. S. W/O. RAMAKRISHNA AGED 57 YEARS R/AT NO.1279, 11TH MAIN, NEAR KODAVA SAMAJA, VIJAYANAGARA I STAGE, MYSURU-570017. 2. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE. MANJAIAH AGED 70 YEARS R/AT NO.1279, 11TH MAIN, NEAR KODAVA SAMAJA, VIJAYANAGARA I STAGE, MYSURU-570017. 3. M/S. DHARMASHREE JAGGERY INDUSTRY PROPRIETOR, SMT. SUKANYA M.S. R/AT NO.139/1, KALLIKOPPALU VILLAGE, SRINIVAS AGRAHARA, K. SHETTIHALLI, MANDYA-571401 (BORROWERS) REGISTERED FIRM. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. S SUSHEELA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. V MOHAN, ADV.) Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52707 WP No. 34018 of 2025 AND: BANK OF INDIA MYSORE BRANCH, ROYAL CROWN, OPP. TO CLOCK TOWER, ASHOKA ROAD, MYSORE-570001 REP. BY AUTHORISED OFFICER/ CHIEF MANAGER SRI.NATARAJ V. (BANKING COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER BANKING REGULATIONS ACT, 1949). …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.M MOHAMMED IBRAHIM, ADV.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2025 PASSED ON IA 2977/2025 IN MA/DIARY NO.1917/2025 (ANNX-A) BY DRT, BANGALORE (DRT-II) IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY; B) QUASH THE RESPONDENTS NOTICE DATED 04.11.2025 SENT TO PETITIONERS TO VACATE THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER ANNX-J AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Memo is filed seeking withdrawal of the petition with a liberty to file appeal before the DRAT, Chennai and the time spent before this court may be excluded for the purpose of limitation. Memo is taken on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52707 WP No. 34018 of 2025 Petitioner wants to approach the DRAT questioning the order passed I.A in the Miscellaneous application by the DRT. The time spent before the court e shall be excluded. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available to him in accordance with law. All pending I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41