Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52756 WP No. 57852 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 57852 OF 2018 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. UMESH H.S.
S/O LATE SRI SHRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST R/A NO.7472/1, BEHIND MARUTI TEMPLE, MARUTI NAGAR ARASIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT-573103 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH S HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001
2.
THE CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ARASIKERE, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573119 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.BOPANNA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;
SMT. VIDYA S., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
Digitally signed by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52756 WP No. 57852 of 2018
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE SECOND RESPONDENT/CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ARASIKERE, TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST / FINAL REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 24.08.2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND REGISTER THE ALLOTTED QUARTERS NO.22, TO THE PETITIONER FORTHWITH OR WITHIN SUCH TIME FRAME AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, BY THE ISSUE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WORK OR ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THE CASE MAY BE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider his representation dated 24.08.2009 and register the quarters No.22 situate at Marutinagara Layout, Arasikere Town, which was allotted to his father, in his favour.
2. During the pendency of this writ petition, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 filed a memo dated 18.11.2025 stating that an endorsement dated 28.08.2009 was issued by the respondent No.2 to the petitioner rejecting his
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52756 WP No. 57852 of 2018
representation dated 24.08.2009 and that the said endorsement was challenged by the petitioner in W.P. No.2767/2010, which was dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of the order dated 07.07.2010 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous as the aforementioned representation of the petitioner is considered and an endorsement dated 28.08.2009 is issued by the respondent No.2. Therefore, the Petition stands disposed off as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50