Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010230652023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/467/2025 KONPONA HAZARIKA AND ANR S/O- SRI KANGKOY HAZARIKA R/O- VILL.- GAYAN GAON P.O. BONAI DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785683. 2: RANTU HAZARIKA S/O- SRI KONPONA HAZARIKA HAZARIKA R/O- VILL.- GAYAN GAON P.O. BONAI DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785683. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT DISPUR DM GUWAHATI 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE (SETTLEMENT) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JORHAT DIST. JORHAT Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM PIN- 785001. 4:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001. 5:THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (SADAR) JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001. 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER TEOK REVENUE CIRCLE TEOK PIN- 785001 DIST. JORHAT ASSAM 7:THE DISTRICT SPORTS OFFICER TEOK DIST. JORHAT ASSAM 8:THE DIRECTORATE OF SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE GOVT. OF ASSAM RUKMINIGAON GUWAHATI-6 DISTRICT KAMRUP (M) ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. ------------ Advocate for : MR. B BARUAH Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 28.03.2025 Heard Mr. B. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicants; Mr. R. Borpujari, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the opposite party nos. 1 & 2; and Ms. S. Konwar, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 3 to 7. 2. The instant interlocutory application has been preferred by the applicants seeking impleadment of the following party – ‘The Directorate of Sports and Youth Welfare, Government of Assam, Rukminigaon, Guwahati – 781006 District – Kamrup [M], Assam Represented by its Director’ - as party-respondent no. 8 in the connected writ petition, W.P.[c] no. 6031/2023. 3. The applicants as the writ petitioners have preferred the connected writ petition assailing inter-alia an action contemplated by the State respondents for eviction. 4. It is stated in this interlocutory application that the proposed party-respondent would be a necessary party to adjudicate the issues involved in the connected writ petition. 5. I have gone through the statements and averments made in the instant interlocutory application, more particularly, paragraph 4 thereof and have found that presence of the proposed party-respondent would be necessary to adjudicate the issues involved in the writ petition. As the prayer for impleadment is also not seriously opposed by the learned counsel for the opposite parties, the instant interlocutory application is accordingly allowed. Page No.# 4/4 6. The applicants-writ petitioners shall file amended cause-title in terms of the Notification no. 79 dated 19.06.2023. On filing such amended cause-title by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the office to cause necessary correction in the cause-title of the writ petition as well as in the CIS. JUDGE Comparing Assistant