IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63028 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2025 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Shanti Devi Son of Rajbali Yadav, Resident of Village - Nimhat, Police Station - Nauhatta, District- Rohtas. 2. Suhila Devi Wife of Shivgovind Yadav @ Shivgovind Singh R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 3. Punam Devi Sanesh Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 4. Shivratiya Devi @ Shivrahi Devi Wife of Lal Bihari Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 5. Sunaina Devi Wife of Ramashish Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 6. Ram Ashish Yadav Son of Balrup Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 7. Shiv Govind Yadav Son of Balrup Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 8. Vinay Yadav Son of Rajwani Yadav @ Rajbali Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. 9. Shyamrati Yadav Son of Gorakh Yadav R/o Village - Nimhat, P.S. - Nauhatta, Dist. - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sushila Devi Wife of Shivgovind Yadav Resident of Village - Nimhat, Police Station - Nauhatta, District- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63028 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 State . 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2)/115(2)/109/118(1)/352/351(2) and 3/5 BNS. 3 . As per F.I.R. on 05.07.2025 at about 6.00 O’ Clock, informant was doing worship , in the meantime , all the 14 F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner assaulted informant and her daughter-in -law due to which they sustained injuries. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature . Case and counter case . Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 4. Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition . 5 . Considering the nature of injury , clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Dehri, (Rohtas) in connection with Majaulia P.S. Case No. 170 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63028 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 ( BNSS) , 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T