- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49966 CRP No. 298 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 298 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ODELLE LAVINIA SHARMAN BERLIE, W/O LATE BERNARD HENRY BERLIE, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.348, 4TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN, NANDANAM COLONY, HRWA LAYOUT, HORAMAVU, BANGALORE - 560 043 2. SMT. TERENIA ANNE BERLIE D/O LATE BERNARD HENRY BERLIE, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.348, 4TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN, NANDANAM COLONY, HRWA LAYOUT, HORAMAVU, BANGALORE - 560 043 3. SMT. YOLANDE CHRISTINE BERLIE MENON D/O LATE BERNARD HENRY BERLIE, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.2046, CHADAS FORD DR. RESTON, 20191 USA., 4. SRI. JOHANSON OLLERTON BERLIE S/O LATE BERNARD HENRY BERLIE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49966 CRP No. 298 of 2024 R/AT NO.222, NORMAL STREET APARTMENT-7, DENTON, TEXAS-76201 USA. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DEVARAJ N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MOTAPPA, S/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT K. CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 084 2. SRI. RENUKESHA S/O MOTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT K.CHANNASANDRA VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 084 3. SRI. HARISH FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PLAINTIFF, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT SREE LAND DEVELOPERS, OPP KATEMMA TEMPLE, CHANNASANDRA HORAMAVU, BANGALORE - 560 043. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2024 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN OS.NO.2725/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49966 CRP No. 298 of 2024 CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, ALLOWING I.A NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER SECTION 10 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 01.12.2025, which reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioners submits that the above petition is not maintainable. Hence withdrawing the petition." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the said memo, the civil revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6 CT-SG