Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35098-2025 Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 Davinder Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Ms.Madhu Bala, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Moudgill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition is for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to 3 to comply with the provisions Section 160 Cr.P.C. (now Section 179 of BNSS) read with Section 41 Cr.P.C. (now Section 35 of BNSS) and further in view of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar, 2014 (3) RCR 527. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is being harassed by respondents No.3 to 7. She submits that the petitioner has already filed representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) before respondent No.2, but no action has been taken on the same till date. She further submits that the respondent-authorities are to proceed as per the law settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s (supra). Notice of motion. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, to decide the representation filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, in accordance with law.
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 08.07.2025 JUDGE sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2025.07.08 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC