IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 211 CWP-9250-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.04.2025. TOTRU MAL ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for seeking quashing of the order dated 21.03.2016 (Annexure P-14) vide which the claim of the petitioner seeking revision of his pension has been declined. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It is noticed that on last more than 05 occasions when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on as many as two occasions and on the remaining three occasions, counsel for the petitioner had sought an adjournment. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the present writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. April 03, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.04 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document