Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73864 (KAR)

M/S SAI ENTERPRISES v. DR. MAHESH M

CCC/985/2024 · 2025-07-21

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27307-DB CCC No. 985 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 985 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M/S SAI ENTERPRISES, NO.21, ADURSTAN SAI, 3RD CROSS, 1ST RIGHT SS FARM ROAD, ALL SAY HYPER MARKET, BANJARA LAYOUT, HORAMAVU, BENGALURU-560 043. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MS. PUSHPALATHA T M, W/O MR. RAMAKRISHNAPPA K. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI NISHANTH A V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DR. MAHESH M, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT, AGED MAJOR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/3, RASHTROTHANA PARISHAT, 2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA, NO.320, 3RD FLOOR, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27307-DB CCC No. 985 of 2024 VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. …ACCUSED (BY SRI P.V CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA FOR R-2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 11.07.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.18263/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. Accused No.1 has filed his compliance affidavit, inter alia, stating that he is awaiting the outcome of the meeting of the District Level Single Window Clearance Committee (DLSWCC). 2. Learned counsel submits that the issue has arisen because the approval of land is in excess of what was available to be allotted and therefore, the decision is required - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27307-DB CCC No. 985 of 2024 to be taken for whether to cancel or to continue to implement the same. 3. The decision taken by the DLSWCC will be communicated to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from day. 4. The present petition is disposed of with the above direction. 5. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34