Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73859 (ALL)

VIKUL SHARMA ALIAS LUCKKY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/24089/2025 · 2025-07-27

Gautam Chowdhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123901 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24089 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikul Sharma Alias Luckky And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The accused applicants are involved in Case Crime No.104 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 131, 126(2), 115(2), 324(4) and 3(5) of B.N.S., Police Station Nagina, Dist rict Bijnor. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case on account of enmity for the purpose of harassment. Applicants committed no offence. Learned counsel further argued that the applicants are not named in the F.I.R. and their surfaced in the confessional statement of named accused Arshad. Learned counsel further argued that neither any incriminating evidence has been collected against the applicants nor the C.C.T.V. shows the complicity of commission of applicants in the alleged offence. Applicants are in jail since 20.06.2025. It is thus contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further argued that there is no possibility of the applicants fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicants are enlarged on bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application but could not dispute the arguments advanced by learned Counsel for the applicants. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 6. Let the applicants Vikul Shyarma alias Lucky and Mohd. Zaqir involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicants shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicants shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. v) The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the complainant would be free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this Court. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 S.Ali Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad