Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7385 (RAJ)

BHUPENDRA SINGH HADA S/O SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH HADA v. RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDHYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/2537/2025 · 2025-02-18

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7107] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2537/2025 Bhupendra Singh Hada S/o Shri Rajendra Singh Hada, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Gagchana, Tehsil Chhipabarod, District Baran At Present Working On The Post Of Technical- Ii, In The Office Of Assistant Engineer (132 Kv Gss) Kolukheri District Baran. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur Its Managing Director. 2. Chief Personnel Officer Rrvpnl, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Assistant Engineer, 132 Kv Gss Rrvpnl, Kolukheri District Baran. 4. Shiv Narayan Kirar, At Present Working On The Post Of Technical-I In The Office Of Assistant Engineer (132 Kv Gssi) Rvpn Jalore ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation. In the facts and circumstances, relying upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, this Court directs the respondent-State that the representation of the petitioner be decided in accordance with law [2025:RJ-JP:7107] (2 of 2) [CW-2537/2025] and they are at liberty to pass any further order considering the administrative exigencies. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /416