132/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PANKAJ ALAIS AMAN SHARMA RAJINDER PAL SHARMA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Aparna Singhal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondent No.10. HARKESH MANUJA By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to judgment and decrees Courts below whereby, a suit for possession by way of partition as well as rendition of accounts preferred at the instance of stands dismissed. Appellant identified by learned counsel representing him. Appellant has made a statement that he does not int same be dismissed as withdrawn. Allowed as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stan 08.09.2025 Tejwinder THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: PANKAJ ALAIS AMAN SHARMA Versus PAL SHARMA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Aparna Singhal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondent No.10. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to judgment and decrees dated 15.03.2014 and 31.05.2019 passed by the Courts below whereby, a suit for possession by way of partition as well as rendition of accounts preferred at the instance of stands dismissed. Appellant-Pankaj Sharma is present in person identified by learned counsel representing him. Appellant has made a statement that he does not intend to press the present appeal and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Allowed as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stan (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5140-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 08, 2025 ........Appellant .......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Aparna Singhal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. Advocate for respondent No.7 Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondent No.10. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to dated 15.03.2014 and 31.05.2019 passed by the Courts below whereby, a suit for possession by way of partition as well as rendition of accounts preferred at the instance of appellant-plaintiff Pankaj Sharma is present in person who has been identified by learned counsel representing him. Appellant has made a end to press the present appeal and the Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) September 08, 2025 By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to dated 15.03.2014 and 31.05.2019 passed by the Courts below whereby, a suit for possession by way of partition as well plaintiff who has been identified by learned counsel representing him. Appellant has made a end to press the present appeal and the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.09.09 23:10 I agree to specified portions of this document