APHC010073572020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4424/2020 Between: 1. SMT ITEPALLI VIDYA, W/O. I. SIVA HINDU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE. R/O. TIRUPATI TOWN, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BLDGS, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, , VIJAYWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , TIRUPATHI URBAN DIST. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , WEST CIRLCE, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, CRIMES POLICE STATION, NEAR TOWN CLUB. TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , WEST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , EAST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 2 9. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ATIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 10. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M R PLLI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 11. MR SIVA PRASAD, , CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WEST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 12. MR GURAVA REDDY, , SENIOR CONSTABLE MAHILA POLICE STATION TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus to declare .he acts on the part of the respondents No. 5,7, 11 Et 12 in interfere petitioner's life, liberty and property by detain the petitioner and her family members in the West Police Station, Tirupati w.e.f 2.1.2020 to 11.1.2020 without registering any crime and asking the petitioner to satisfy their physical lust, and monitory amounts to erroneous, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violaitve of Article 14, Et 21 of the Cons .itution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to held an enquiry against the respondents 11 Et 12 either by appointing separate wing/agency or otherwise the case may be entrust to CBCID in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 5 to 12 not to interfere with life, liberty and property of the petitioner without registering any crime pending disposal of the above WP in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus to declare .he acts on the part of the respondents No. 5,7, 11 Et 12 in interfere petitioner's life, liberty and property by detain the petitioner and her family members in the West Police Station, Tirupati w.e.f 2.1.2020 to 11.1.2020 without registering any crime and asking the petitioner to satisfy their physical lust, and monitory amounts to erroneous, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violaitve of Article 14, Et 21 of the Cons .itution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to held an enquiry against the respondents 11 Et 12 either by appointing separate wing/agency or otherwise the case may be entrust to CBCID in the interest of justice and to pass...…” 2. Heard Sri E.Anjana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are interfering in a civil matter and calling the petitioner to the police station frequently though no crime has been registered against the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents since no crime has been registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 190 W.P.No.4424 of 2020 Dated: 13.08.2025 MH