Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7382 (UTT)

SANTOSH SINGH RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1596/2025 · 2025-06-11

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 18 WPMS No.1596 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Prashant Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was involved in some cases pertaining to matrimonial discord, including criminal cases, but all of them have been settled mutually between the parties. Now the petitioner proposes to visit abroad for his livelihood, but the respondent no. 3/ Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun, is not processing the verification of the petitioner, despite representation having been given by the petitioner on 21.04.2025, Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition. Learned State Counsel would submit that the representation that has been given by the petitioner shall be decided within a period of six weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. The petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent no.3/ Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun, that the representation made by the petitioner shall be decided within a period of six weeks by the respondent no.3/ Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun, in accordance with the law/guidelines. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 11.06.2025 RV