IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 102 Amarveer Singh State of Haryana and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) order or direction especially for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders dated 01.10.2025 and 29.9.2025 (Annexures P the allotment of rice mills of respondents No.5 to 8 to respond No.4 i.e. Hafed in utter violation of the mandatory conditions as enshrined in milling policy of kharif marketing session issued by respondent No.1 vide Memo No.RP Further, direction is being sought against respondent/St Hafed i.e. respondent No.4 not to proceed to allot/store the paddy in the rice mills of respondents No.5 to 8 during the pendency of the present writ petition. CWP-18393-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.18393 of 2026 Date of decision : Amarveer Singh Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G. Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of writ, or direction especially for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders dated 01.10.2025 and 29.9.2025 (Annexures P-2 and P-2/A) passed by respondent No.3 of the allotment of rice mills of respondents No.5 to 8 to respond No.4 i.e. Hafed in utter violation of the mandatory conditions as enshrined in milling policy of kharif marketing session issued by respondent No.1 vide Memo No.RP-02-190 Further, direction is being sought against respondent/St Hafed i.e. respondent No.4 not to proceed to allot/store the paddy in the rice mills of respondents No.5 to 8 during the pendency of the present writ petition. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 18393 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-01.07.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sandeep Kotla, Advocate Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Prayer in the present writ petition is for issuance of writ, or direction especially for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders dated 01.10.2025 and 2/A) passed by respondent No.3 of the allotment of rice mills of respondents No.5 to 8 to respondent No.4 i.e. Hafed in utter violation of the mandatory conditions as enshrined in milling policy of kharif marketing session issued by 190-2025 dated 16/18.9.2025. Further, direction is being sought against respondent/State as well as Hafed i.e. respondent No.4 not to proceed to allot/store the paddy in the rice mills of respondents No.5 to 8 during the pendency of the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.01 18.07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document length. prima facie view that the petitioner does not appear to have any enforceable legal right in the matter and, consequently, lacks the requisite locus standi to maintain the present petition, as no civil or legal right of the petitioner is shown to have been adversely affected by the impugned action. for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail such other remedy the petitioner in accordance with law. withdrawn remedy, if so advised and of. July 01, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CWP-18393-2026 (O & M) Learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard at some During the course of hearing, this Court expressed its prima facie view that the petitioner does not appear to have any enforceable legal right in the matter and, consequently, lacks the requisite locus standi to maintain the present petition, as no civil or ht of the petitioner is shown to have been adversely affected by the impugned action. Faced with the aforesaid observations, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail such other remedy the petitioner in accordance with law. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Accordingly, the present writ petition is withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to avail an appropriate remedy, if so advised and permissible in law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard at some ourse of hearing, this Court expressed its prima facie view that the petitioner does not appear to have any enforceable legal right in the matter and, consequently, lacks the requisite locus standi to maintain the present petition, as no civil or ht of the petitioner is shown to have been adversely affected Faced with the aforesaid observations, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail such other remedy as may be available to Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as , with liberty to the petitioner to avail an appropriate permissible in law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.01 18.07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document