Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7382 (AP)

E.Srinivasa Reddy, v. The State of A.P.,

WP/3239/2018 · 2025-07-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010073452018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3239/2018 Between: 1. E.SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O E.SOMI REDDY, AGED 53 YEARS, EXECUTIUVE ENGINEER FAC, (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER I/C), ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPOMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC) GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC), REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL ROAD, BESIDES SAIRAM THEATRE,CHITTI NAGAR,VIJAYAWADA- 1, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. LANKA ANANDA RAO, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC), ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to the Managing Director 2nd respondent Corporation not to pass any orders keeping the 3rd respondent as Executive Engineer,Full Additional Charge at Guntur Division in which post the Petitioner is functioning as full Additional Charge Executive Engineer as per the directions of Managing Director, 2nd respondent Corporation basing on the letter addressed by the Additional Private Secretary to Honble Minister for Human Resources Development, Government of Andhra Pradesh as one temporary/incharge/ full additional charge officer cannot be replaced by another temporary/incharge/full additional charge Officer and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent Corporation rep. by its Managing Director to maintain status quo of the Petitioner as Executive Engineer (FAC) till a regular Executive Engineer was posted at Guntur Division and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SEENA KUMAR (SC FOR APEWIDC AND RVM SSA 2. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3239/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to the Managing Director 2nd respondent Corporation not to pass any orders keeping the 3rd respondent as Executive Engineer, Full Additional Charge at Guntur Division in which post the Petitioner is functioning as full Additional Charge Executive Engineer as per the directions of Managing Director, 2nd respondent Corporation basing on the letter addressed by the Additional Private Secretary to Hon’ble Minister for Human Resources Development, Government of Andhra Pradesh as one temporary/incharge/full additional charge officer cannot be replaced by another temporary/incharge/full additional charge Officer and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Y.V. Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petition may be disposed of, no further orders are required in this matter, since the relief has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.07.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3239 of 2018 Dated.02.07.2025 UPS 53 \