V.Dayalan v. Thiru. V.Rajaraman, IAS., and another
CONT P/2500/2025 · 2025-09-12
T Vinod Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73817 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73817 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont.P.No.2500 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :12.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Cont.P.No.2500 of 2025 V.Dayalan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Thiru.V.Rajaraman, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Information and Public Relation Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.Dr.R.Vaidyanathan, I.A.S., Director, Information and Public Relation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed in the writ petition in W.P.No.15920 of 2021 dated 24.06.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.2500 of 2025
ORDER This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.15920 of 2021 dated
24.06.2022. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, has placed before this Court a copy of the affidavit filed by the first respondent dated 12.09.2025, whereby, it is stated that the order of this Court has been complied with in its letter and spirit. 3. By stating as above, the learned Special Government Pleader has also filed into this Court a copy of the proceedings dated 18.07.2025. 4. Considering the said submission, and having regard to the fact that the first respondent had passed order dated 18.07.2025, this Court is of the view that the respondents have complied with the order of this Court, though with a delay, for which, the first respondent had expressed regret by his affidavit. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.2500 of 2025
5. In view of the above, since the respondents have complied with the order of this Court, though not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that since an order has been passed, it is open for the petitioner to assail the said order, if he is aggrieved by the same. 6. For the aforesaid reason, there is no necessity to proceed with the contempt petition and no further adjudication is necessary and therefore, the Contempt Petition is closed.
12.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No msv To 1.Thiru.V.Rajaraman, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Information and Public Relation Department, State of Tamil Nadu,Fort St.George,Chennai 600 009. 2.Dr.R.Vaidyanathan, I.A.S., Director, Information and Public Relation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.2500 of 2025 T.VINOD KUMAR,J. msv Cont.P.No.2500 of 2025 12.09.2025 _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis