- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34920-DB WP No. 6582 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO.6582 OF 2022 (GM-KLA) BETWEEN: G. BHASKAR PRABHU S/O. LATE G. KRISHNA PRABHU AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS RESIDENT OF "SRINIVASA NILAYA" GANESH RAISE MILL COMPOUND KULSHEKAR POST MANGALURU-575 005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA STATE KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD KADHI BHAVAN NO.10, JASMA BHAVAN ROAD BENGALURU-52 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY. 2. KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA MULTI-STORIED BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. IN CHARGE ADDITINAL REGISTRAR OF ENQUIRIES-6 KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA MULTI-STORIED BUILDING Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34920-DB WP No. 6582 of 2022 DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRAKASH TIMMANNA HEBBAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI VENKATESH S. ARABATTI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 AND R-3) * * * THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO i) CALL FOR THE RECORDS ii) SET ASIDE THE ORDER NO.KB/EST-2/66/2021-22 DATED 30/08/2021 AT ANNEXURE-A, PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT, RECOMMENDATION DATED 28/03/2016 MADE BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE NO.LOK/ARE-6/ENQ-486/2011 AT ANNEXURE-B AND THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 14/03/2016 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN NO.LOK/ARE-6/ENQ-486/2011 AT ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would like to withdraw this Writ Petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34920-DB WP No. 6582 of 2022 In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we allow the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the withdrawal of the petition, pending Interlocutory applications, if any, does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23