IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1674 of 2025 1. Manu Giri @ Abhimanu Giri, Aged about 52 years, Son of Yamuna Giri, Resident of-Village-Jhar Katiya, P.O. & P.S.-- Lesliganj, District-Palamau 2. Kunal Giri @ Kunal Kumar Giri, Aged about 26 years, Son of Abhimanyu Giri, Resident of-Village-Jhar Katiya, P.O.-Lesliganj, P.S.-Lesliganj, District- Palamau (Jharkhand). 3. Rina Devi, Aged about 47 years, Wife of Abhimanyu Giri, Resident of-Village-Jhar Katiya, P.O.-Lesliganj, P.S.-Lesliganj, District-Palamau (Jharkhand). 4. Riti Devi, Aged about 27 years, Wife of Kunal Kumar Giri @ Kunal Giri, Resident of-Village-Jhar Katiya, P.O.-Lesliganj, P.S.- Lesliganj, District-Palamau (Jharkhand). … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Prajapati , Adv. For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak , Addl.. PP 02 / 20.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Lesliganj P.S. Case No. 140 of 2024 registered under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 303(2), 351, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, caused grievous injury by using deadly weapons and committed theft of silver bracelet. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the selfsame occurrence, Lesliganj P.S. Case No. 139 of 2024 was instituted. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or the victim or their family members in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Palamau in connection with Lesliganj P.S. Case No. 140 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victim or their family members in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-