ISHFAQ AHMAD SOOD v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (POLICE / HOME)
Bail App/268/2025 · 2026-04-24
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 738 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 738 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Bail App 268/2025.
ISHFAQ AHMAD SOOD.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Syed Aushaq Hussain, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy AG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 24.04.2026
01. The petitioner through the medium of the instant petition which has been preferred under Section 482 of theBharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 71/2025 under Sections 64, 333 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Police Station Boniyar Baramulla.
02. Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General has drawn the attention of the Court to the status report filed by the respondents in which a categoric stand has been taken that pursuant to filing of the instant bail application, the petitioner has already preferred CrlM No. 19/2026 in which the Court has been pleased to stay further investigation in the impugned FIR and accordingly no further investigation has been conducted by the concerned Police Station after passing of the order by this Court. 09 Regular
03. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant bail application in the light of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid petition.Statement of the
learned counsel is taken on record.
04. In view of the above, the instant bail petition isdismissed as withdrawn.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 24.04.2026 Bisma Jan.