CWP-34718 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (136) Jaswinder Kaur and another State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. this Court is that his application bearing CRM titled ‘State of Punjab vs. Surinder Pal’, in case FIR No.241 dated 19.11.2025 under Sections 303(2), 329(3), 61(2) and 3( 379, 447, 120 Hoshiarpur, seeking permission to visit abroad is pending consideration since 30.04.2026. 2. application (supra), is required to be decided expeditiously, otherwise the sole purpose of filing the same would be defeated. 3. 4. behalf of the respondent 34718-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jaswinder Kaur and another Versus State of Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) The main grievance which propelled the petitioner to approach this Court is that his application bearing CRM titled ‘State of Punjab vs. Surinder Pal’, in case FIR No.241 dated 19.11.2025 under Sections 303(2), 329(3), 61(2) and 3(5) of BNS (corresponding Secitons 379, 447, 120-B and 34 IPC), registered at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur, seeking permission to visit abroad is pending consideration since 30.04.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits t application (supra), is required to be decided expeditiously, otherwise the sole purpose of filing the same would be defeated. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State of Punjab, and waives service. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-34718-2026 Date of Decision : 26.06.2026 …Petitioners Versus ...Respondent KULDEEP TIWARI Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab. The main grievance which propelled the petitioner to approach this Court is that his application bearing CRM-265-2026 (Annexure P- titled ‘State of Punjab vs. Surinder Pal’, in case FIR No.241 dated 19.11.2025 5) of BNS (corresponding Secitons B and 34 IPC), registered at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur, seeking permission to visit abroad is pending consideration since Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the application (supra), is required to be decided expeditiously, otherwise the sole purpose of filing the same would be defeated. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab, accepts notice on Punjab, and waives service. The main grievance which propelled the petitioner to approach -3), titled ‘State of Punjab vs. Surinder Pal’, in case FIR No.241 dated 19.11.2025 5) of BNS (corresponding Secitons B and 34 IPC), registered at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur, seeking permission to visit abroad is pending consideration since the application (supra), is required to be decided expeditiously, otherwise the sole Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl. AG, Punjab, accepts notice on MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.26 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-34718 5. counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the asked for direction can be passed upon the trial Court concerned. Therefore, the latter is directed to decide the application (supra), within a period of seven working days, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. June 26, 2026 Manpreet 34718-2026 Considering the innocuous and counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the asked for direction can be passed upon the trial Court concerned. Therefore, ter is directed to decide the application (supra), within a period of seven working days, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Consequently, the instant petition is 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 and bana fide prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the asked for direction can be passed upon the trial Court concerned. Therefore, ter is directed to decide the application (supra), within a period of seven working days, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the asked for direction can be passed upon the trial Court concerned. Therefore, ter is directed to decide the application (supra), within a period of seven MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.26 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment