CRM-M-33474- 207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Faeem State of U.T.Chandiarh CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. DEEPAK GUPTA 1. This is the second petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 351(2) of BNS (corresponding to Sections 376(2)(f), 323, 506 IPC) Police Station Indl. Area, U.T.Chandigarh 32344-2025) was 2. Allegations are that marriage of the victim H.J (name withheld) was fixed with the petitioner. However, before petitioner gave beatings to the victim and forcibly comm registered on the complaint of sister of the victim. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact the petitioner and the victim were in consensual relationship. Their engagement ceremony was earlier not performed and the present FIR was got registered. Later on the matter has been compromised with the been appended as and as per the said compromise, both the parties have decided to solemnize the -2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM Date of Decision : VERSUS U.T.Chandiarh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- DEEPAK GUPTA J. (Oral) This is the second petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.103 dated 07.11.2024 351(2) of BNS (corresponding to Sections 376(2)(f), 323, 506 IPC) Indl. Area, U.T.Chandigarh. The earlier petition ) was dismissed on 03.11.2025 (Annexure P Allegations are that marriage of the victim H.J (name withheld) was fixed with the petitioner. However, before the gave beatings to the victim and forcibly comm registered on the complaint of sister of the victim. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact the petitioner and the victim were in consensual relationship. Their engagement ceremony was earlier performed, but due to some misunderstanding, not performed and the present FIR was got registered. Later on the matter has been compromised with the intervention of the respectables. Copy of compromise been appended as Annexure P-2, which is signed by the victim as well as complainant and as per the said compromise, both the parties have decided to solemnize the -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33474-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.06.2026 ....Petitioner ....Respondent DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. This is the second petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of 07.11.2024, under Sections 64(2)(f), 115(2), 351(2) of BNS (corresponding to Sections 376(2)(f), 323, 506 IPC), registered at . The earlier petition bearing No. CRM- (Annexure P-14). Allegations are that marriage of the victim H.J (name withheld) was the marriage could be performed, the gave beatings to the victim and forcibly committed rape upon her. FIR was registered on the complaint of sister of the victim. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact the petitioner and the victim were in consensual relationship. Their engagement due to some misunderstanding, marriage was not performed and the present FIR was got registered. Later on the matter has been intervention of the respectables. Copy of compromise hich is signed by the victim as well as complainant and as per the said compromise, both the parties have decided to solemnize the This is the second petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of s 64(2)(f), 115(2), , registered at -M- Allegations are that marriage of the victim H.J (name withheld) was marriage could be performed, the itted rape upon her. FIR was It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact the petitioner and the victim were in consensual relationship. Their engagement marriage was not performed and the present FIR was got registered. Later on the matter has been has hich is signed by the victim as well as complainant and as per the said compromise, both the parties have decided to solemnize the TRIPTI SAINI 2026.06.17 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-33474- marriage of the petitioner with the victim once the petitioner is released on bail without any delay. 4. Notice of motion. 5. Mr. Ganesh K. Sharma, Addl. P.P.U.T.Chandigarh behalf of the respondent on behalf of the complainant and has filed his power of attorney. as the complainant the compromise 6. Having regard t fact that the petitioner has already undergone days, as per the custody certificate and of the case, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail and he is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. 7. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. June 16, 2026 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable -2026 (O&M) marriage of the petitioner with the victim once the petitioner is released on bail without any delay. Notice of motion. Mr. Ganesh K. Sharma, Addl. P.P.U.T.Chandigarh half of the respondent – State. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed his power of attorney. as the complainant are also present in Court, who submit that they are satisfied with and pray for releasing the petitioner on bail. Having regard to the aforesaid factual position and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already undergone custody of 01 year, 07 months and 03 days, as per the custody certificate and without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail and he is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- marriage of the petitioner with the victim once the petitioner is released on bail Mr. Ganesh K. Sharma, Addl. P.P.U.T.Chandigarh, accepts notice on State. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed his power of attorney. The victim as well also present in Court, who submit that they are satisfied with and pray for releasing the petitioner on bail. o the aforesaid factual position and keeping in view the custody of 01 year, 07 months and 03 without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail and he is ordered to be released surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No marriage of the petitioner with the victim once the petitioner is released on bail , accepts notice on State. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance The victim as well also present in Court, who submit that they are satisfied with o the aforesaid factual position and keeping in view the custody of 01 year, 07 months and 03 without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail and he is ordered to be released surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned TRIPTI SAINI 2026.06.17 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document