Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7377 (CHH)

SANDEEP ADAWAT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/995/2025 · 2025-02-27

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9923 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 995 of 2025 1 - Sandeep Adawat S/o Ashok Adawat Aged About 21 Years R/o R Manpur, P.S. Parsola District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Statin Pulgaon (Chowki- Jeora Sirsa) District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Sunita Sahu, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 27/02/2025 The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as she is in custody in connection with Crime No. 325/2024 registered at police station Pulgaon, Chowki Jeora-Sirsa,District Durg (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 509(B) of IPC and Sections 12,14 and 15 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.03.01 13:39:13 +0530 2 2. Prosecution case in brief is that on 29.06.2024, report was lodged by the mother of the prosecutrix alleging that the victim developed friendship with the accused/applicant through instagram and he committed the offence of intruding upon her privacy by hacking her whatsapp and stored the pornographic material, and made viral. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that the prosecutrix and her mother have turned hostile and had not supported the case of prosecution. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 8.10.2024, the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, he is ready and willing to comply with any of the conditions which may be imposed upon him and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the bail application. 5. Victim and her mother appeared through the concerned DLSA and have raised no objection. 6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. On due consideration of the rival submissions and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 8.10.2024, the charge sheet has been filed and looking to the fact that the final disposal of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time, the present application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, her bail application is allowed. 8. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the 3 concerned trial court, she shall be released on bail on the following conditions: i) He/she shall appear before the trial court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. ii) He/she shall not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Iii) the applicant is directed not to communicate/contact in any manner with the prosecutrix, her family members and the witnesses cited in the charge sheet any other person concerned or attempt to ask for any favour in the trial directly or indirectly. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge