Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121802 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3451 of 2024 Revisionist :- Mohammad Taz Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari,Priyansh,Ravindra Kumar Pandey,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Saurabh Kumar Pandey,Som Nath Pandey Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J. 1. Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Priyansh and Revindra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the revisionist, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that the revisionist does not want to press this criminal revision on merit. He further submits that since vide impugned order dated 27.05.2024, the application filed by the revisionist, for altering the charge under Section 216 Cr.P.C., had been rejected therefore, it may be made open that if at any subsequent stage, the trial court comes to the conclusion that there is necessity for altering the charge, in exercise of its power under Section 216 Cr.P.C., the same may be done. 2. Sri Rajesh Kumar Advocate, holding brief of Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Parties No. 2 to 6 does not have any objection to the aforesaid limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the revisionist. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, it is provided that if at any subsequent stage, the trial court comes to the conclusion that there is necessity for altering the charge, as contemplated under Section 216 Cr.P.C., the trial court would be free to pass necessary order. 4. Accordingly, this criminal revision is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Gss Digitally signed by :- GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad