Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73757 (PNJ)

GURPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/34215/2025 · 2025-09-11

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34215-2025 Date of decision: 11.09.2025 GURPREET SINGH ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present: Mr. Gurbinder Sidhu, Advocate for Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gorav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.21 dated 10.02.2025 registered at Police Station ‘A’ Division (Police Commissionerate), District Amritsar, under Sections 21-B, 27-A & 29 of NDPS Act. 2. In compliance of order dated 04.07.2025, short reply by way of affidavit dated 10.09.2025 of Dr. Sheetal Singh, PPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, East, Amritsar filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. 3. Today, learned State counsel has informed this Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation, in compliance of the order dated 04.07.2025 and is no longer required for further investigation. Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.11 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4. In view of the aforesaid, the order dated 04.07.2025, whereby the petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. However, he shall continue to join investigation, if and so required by the Investigating Officer. 5. Disposed of. 6. Pending misc application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 11.09.2025 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.11 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document