Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73757 (MAD)

Stephen v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/19225/2025 · 2025-07-09

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.19225 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.19225 of 2025 Stephen ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, SHO Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore. Crime No.47 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.47 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks bail. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Kalidass For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.03.2025 in Crime No.47 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 331(3), 305(a) of BNS on the file of the respondent police seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19225 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and committed theft of 84 grams of gold jewels. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that the petitioner has 25 previous cases of similar nature. He further submitted that stolen property has been recovered and the investigation has been completed. 5. Though the stolen property in this case has been fully recovered and the investigation has been completed, considering the bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19225 of 2025 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09.07.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, SHO Annamalai Nagar Police Station, Cuddalore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19225 of 2025 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.19225 of 2025 09.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis