902-4441-2016-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4441 OF 2016 Kashiling Haridas Shejal … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents …………. Mr. Nagesh Chavan i/b Mr. Prasad Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. R.P. Kadam, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for the Respondent – State. …………. Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : November 19, 2025. P. C. : 1. We expressed that the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that appropriate application will be iled before the Tribunal. 2. In this view of the matter, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue the application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.11.20 10:13:52 +0530 902-4441-2016-CWP=.doc 3. Since the period spent in prosecuting the petition is bona ide, the same be considered sympathetically if the objection is raised as regards the limitation in challenging the impugned order before the Tribunal. 4. Keeping all contentions open, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2