Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73752 (KAR)

SHRI. R. RANGANATHA v. MR. BINOD KUMAR

CCC/975/2024 · 2025-12-17

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.975 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SHRI R. RANGANATHA SON OF LATE RAMADAS, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.912/A, 9TH CROSS, 10TH A MAIN, SRINAGAR BENGALURU 560050. ...COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. P.S.RAJAGOPAL, SR. ADV. FOR SRI. ANANDA GANGENURA, ADV.) AND: MR. BINOD KUMAR MD AND CEO OF INDIAN BANK A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER, THE BANKING COMPANIES, (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING) ACT, 19 70 HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE, NO.254-260, AVVAI SHANMUGAM SALAI, ROYAPETTAH, CHENNAI - 600014. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. VIGHNESHWAR S. SHASTRI, SR. ADV. FOR SRI. UDAYA SHANKAR RAI P., ADV.) 2 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPTS COURT ACT, 1971 AND THE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1987, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DATED 21.04.2023 IN W.P. NO.14733/2021 (GM-DRT) PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON 17.11.2025 AND COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, ANU SIVARAMAN J., PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CAV JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned senior counsel appearing for the complainant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and has filed a memo dated 10.12.2025 to that effect. The memo for withdrawal reads as under:- "The undersigned Advocate for the Complainant hereby submits and requested that this Hon'ble Court may kindly permit the Complainant to withdraw the above Contempt petition as not pressed. The memo along with submission 3 may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In view of the memo for withdrawal, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE cp*