- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51512 RP No. 390 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REVIEW PETITION NO. 390 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. CV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRSENTATIVE P. ANIL KUMAR JAIN. 2. SRI. BHARATH SUBBA RAO S/O VENAKTARAMAIAH SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 092 3. SRI. SHASHIDHAR PAI S/O KOKKARNE SRINIVAS PAI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 092 (APPELLANTS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR SPA HOLDER P. ANIL KUMAR) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51512 RP No. 390 of 2023 4. SRI. VINOD S. MENON S/O SUNDHINDRA MENON AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 092. 5. MR. G NANDEESH S/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 092. 6. MR. P. ANIL KUMAR JAIN NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 092. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIVEK HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI NAGRAJ SHETTY. K S/O S MAHABALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SRUSHUTI NIVAS, 2ND MAIN 6TH CROSS, ASHRAM COLONY SANJAY NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 094. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT IS SERVED AND UNEPRESENTED) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51512 RP No. 390 of 2023 DATED 09/11/2022 IN MFA NO. 3004/2022 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS AS MAY BE JUST. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners submits that during pendency of this Review Petition, main suit has been disposed of rendering this petition infructuous. 2. In view of said submission, Review Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31