IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27640 of 2025 Satyabati Nayak ..…... Petitioner(s) Mr. Sukanta Kumar Nayak, Adv. -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ……..…. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Sonak Mishra, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 26.09.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard. 3. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the notice of eviction dated 12.09.2025/Annexure-10 issued by the Tahasildar, Nischintakoili/Opposite Party No.3 in Encroachment Case No.331 of 2024-25. 4. Challenging the notice of eviction vide Annexure-10, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that pertaining to the selfsame dispute the Petitioner has already preferred an appeal vide O.P.L.E. Appeal No.10/2025 which is pending before the Sub- Collector, Cuttack. He further contends that during pendency of the said appeal the present notice of eviction vide Annexure-10 has been issued to the Petitioner by the Tahasildar, Nischintakoili Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 27-Sep-2025 14:11:45 Signature Not Verified 2 which is per se illegal. He, accordingly, prays for setting aside of the said notice of eviction vide Annexure-10. 5. Considering the above submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court directs that appeal at the instance of the Petitioner vide O.P.L.E Appeal No.10/2025 shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of presentation of an authenticated copy of this order. 6. It is further directed that till a decision on the above noted appeal at the instance of the Petitioner is taken, the impugned notice of eviction vide Annexure-10 shall not be given effect to. 7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu Designation: Personal Assistant