Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7373 (PNJ)

NANCY BAGGA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7027/2025 · 2026-05-25

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-7027-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (264 ) NANCY BAGGA STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr Mr. Lakhan Paul Garg, (through video conferencing) Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Gurinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate and Ms. Garima Thappar, Advocate for respondents No.7 and 8 MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. As per the report received from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, no mediation could be taken place between the parties. 2. On 16.07.2025, learned counsel for the respondents No.6 to 8 had informed this Court that the detenue i.e. the minor petitioner had been taken by the respondent No.6 alongwith him to New Zealand on 09.07.2025 and she is residing there and the same stand taken in this Court today. 2025 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 25.05.2026 NANCY BAGGA Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. J.S. Gill, Advocate and Mr. Lakhan Paul Garg,, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conferencing) Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Gurinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate and Ms. Garima Thappar, Advocate for respondents No.7 and 8 **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) As per the report received from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, no mediation could be taken place between the parties. On 16.07.2025, learned counsel for the respondents No.6 to 8 rmed this Court that the detenue i.e. the minor petitioner had been taken by the respondent No.6 alongwith him to New Zealand on 09.07.2025 and she is residing there and the same stand taken in this Court today. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-7027-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gurinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate and Ms. Garima Thappar, Advocate for respondents No.7 and 8 As per the report received from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, no mediation could be taken place between the parties. On 16.07.2025, learned counsel for the respondents No.6 to 8 rmed this Court that the detenue i.e. the minor daughter of the petitioner had been taken by the respondent No.6 alongwith him to New Zealand on 09.07.2025 and she is residing there and the same stand is also AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.25 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-7027-2025 3. In view of withdrawal of the petition at this stage with liberty to seek all the alternative remedies as available to the petitioner in accordance with law. 4. Permitted to do so. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with th 25.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2025 (O&M) (2) In view of this fact, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition at this stage with liberty to seek all the alternative remedies as available to the petitioner in accordance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No this fact, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition at this stage with liberty to seek all the alternative remedies as available to the petitioner in accordance with law. e aforesaid liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.25 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.