VIRENDRA YADAV ALIAS BIRENDRA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1507/2025 · 2025-03-06
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7373 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7373 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.1507 of 2025
------ Virendra Yadav @ Birendra Yadav aged about 36 years, son of Late Chandradeo Yadav, resident of Dhawavar, P.O. Dangwar, P.S. Hussainabad, Dist.-Palamau (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 06-03-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Hussainabad (Mahila) P.S. Case No.03 of 2024 instituted under Sections 74, 75, 351 (2-3) of the B.N.S., 2023 the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner outraged the modesty of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that petitioner had earlier instituted Hussainabad P.S. Case No.247 of 2024 and after four days of the lodging of the said case, the instant case was lodged against the petitioner which is after thought. It is further submitted that petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or
surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Hussainabad (Mahila) P.S. Case No.03 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/