CWP-3110 116 (3 cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 1. Randhir Singh and ors. State of Haryana and ors. 2. Rajwati and anr. State of Haryana and ors. 3. Chanderwati State of Haryana and ors. CORAM: Present: 3110-2017 (O&M) & 2 others [ cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Date of Decision: CWP Randhir Singh and ors. Versus State of Haryana and ors. CWP Rajwati and anr. Versus State of Haryana and ors. CWP Chanderwati Versus State of Haryana and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for petitioners No.2 and 4 (CWP Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate and Ms. Sureya Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner (CWP-23377 Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for respondent No.4 (CWP for respondents No.4 & 5 (CWP Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Vohra, Advocate for respondent No.4 (CWP --- [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 26.08.2025 CWP-3110-2017 (O&M) …….Petitioners Versus ..….Respondents CWP-14766-2018 (O&M) …….Petitioners Versus .….Respondents CWP-23377-2022 (O&M) …….Petitioner Versus .….Respondents MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for petitioners No.2 and 4 (CWP-3110-2017) Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate and Ms. Sureya Gautam, Advocate 23377-2022) Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for respondent No.4 (CWP-3110-2017) for respondents No.4 & 5 (CWP-14766-2018) Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Vohra, Advocate for respondent No.4 (CWP-23377-2022) SANJAY GUPTA 2025.08.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3110 HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) petitions therein. For convenience, facts are being taken from 2017. 2. to the apportionment of compensation payable to Bhagat Singh son of Uday Singh whose share in the joint land situated within the revenue estate of Village Jharsa, District Gurugram came to be acquired vide notifications dated 11.12.2013 and 10.12.2014 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short ‘the Act’, followed by an award dated 09.12.2016 against which a sum of Rs.12.05 crores was deposited with the 3. Uday Singh: Chandrawati (Daughter) 4. under Section 71 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 2012, at the instance of Mahipal Singh son of Uday Singh by impleading General Public, Mahipal was appointed as Guardian of his brother Bhagat Singh. 3110-2017 (O&M) & 2 others [ HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) This order of mine shall dispose of all the above said petitions by way of a common order as identical facts are involved therein. For convenience, facts are being taken from The short dispute in all the aforementioned petitions rel to the apportionment of compensation payable to Bhagat Singh son of Uday Singh whose share in the joint land situated within the revenue estate of Village Jharsa, District Gurugram came to be acquired vide notifications dated 11.12.2013 and 10.12.2014 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short ‘the Act’, followed by an award dated 09.12.2016 against which a sum of Rs.12.05 crores was deposited with the learned Reference Court at Gurugram. At this stage, it may be relevant to give pedigree table of Uday Singh:- UDAY SINGH | Chandrawati (Daughter) Rajwanti (Daughter) Beer Singh (Son) Vide order dated 12.09.2014 passed in GW under Section 71 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 2012, at the instance of Mahipal Singh son of Uday Singh by impleading General Public, Mahipal was appointed as Guardian of his brother Bhagat Singh. [2] This order of mine shall dispose of all the above said writ by way of a common order as identical facts are involved therein. For convenience, facts are being taken from CWP-3110 The short dispute in all the aforementioned petitions rel to the apportionment of compensation payable to Bhagat Singh son of Uday Singh whose share in the joint land situated within the revenue estate of Village Jharsa, District Gurugram came to be acquired vide notifications dated 11.12.2013 and 10.12.2014 issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short ‘the Act’, followed by an award dated 09.12.2016 against which a sum of Rs.12.05 crores was Reference Court at Gurugram. relevant to give pedigree table of UDAY SINGH Jagat Singh (son) (since deceased) | Bhagat Singh (Son) Randhir Singh (Son) Naresh Kumar (Son) 12.09.2014 passed in GW-1 of 2014 filed under Section 71 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 2012, at the instance of Mahipal Singh son of Uday Singh by impleading General Public, Mahipal was appointed as Guardian of his brother Bhagat Singh. writ by way of a common order as identical facts are involved 3110- The short dispute in all the aforementioned petitions relate to the apportionment of compensation payable to Bhagat Singh son of Uday Singh whose share in the joint land situated within the revenue estate of Village Jharsa, District Gurugram came to be acquired vide issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for short ‘the Act’, followed by an award dated 09.12.2016 against which a sum of Rs.12.05 crores was relevant to give pedigree table of 1 of 2014 filed under Section 71 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 2012, at the instance of Mahipal Singh son of Uday Singh by impleading General Public, SANJAY GUPTA 2025.08.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3110 5. to be filed: 11 CPC came to be filed at the instance of Mahipal son of Uday Singh which were allowed on 05.12.2024 No.518 of 2025 was filed from the proceedings arising out of GW 9/2017 and the order dated 29.01.2025, thereby restoring GW adjudication. 6. the instance of Chanderwati from the proceedings arising out of GW16/2018 against the order dated 05.12.2024, wherein notice of motion has been issued and the same is pending for 20.09.2025 before this Court. 7. Uday Singh and brothers and sisters of Bhagat Singh have arrived at a concurrence that all the three cases can be disposed of at this stage awaiting the final outcome of the abovementioned two petition 9/2017 and GW 3110-2017 (O&M) & 2 others [ Assailing the said order, following two petitions were came to be filed:- (a) GW-9/2017 filed by Rajwati, Singh and Naresh Kumar against Mahipal and other official respondents which is pending for 11.09.2025; and (b) GW-16/2018 titled as Chanderwati Vs. Mahipal and another. In both the above petitions, application 11 CPC came to be filed at the instance of Mahipal son of Uday Singh which were allowed on 05.12.2024. H No.518 of 2025 was filed from the proceedings arising out of GW 9/2017 and the said appeal came to be allowed by this Court vide its order dated 29.01.2025, thereby restoring GW adjudication. Similarly, FAO No. 1724 of 2025 came to be preferred at the instance of Chanderwati from the proceedings arising out of GW16/2018 against the order dated 05.12.2024, wherein notice of motion has been issued and the same is pending for 20.09.2025 before this Court. All the parties, who are sons and daughters of deceased Uday Singh and brothers and sisters of Bhagat Singh have arrived at a concurrence that all the three cases can be disposed of at this stage awaiting the final outcome of the abovementioned two petition 9/2017 and GW-16/2018. [3] order, following two petitions were came 9/2017 filed by Rajwati, Beer Singh, Randhir Singh and Naresh Kumar against Mahipal and other official respondents which is pending for 16/2018 titled as Chanderwati Vs. Mahipal In both the above petitions, applications under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC came to be filed at the instance of Mahipal son of Uday Singh . However, aggrieved thereof, FAO No.518 of 2025 was filed from the proceedings arising out of GW came to be allowed by this Court vide its order dated 29.01.2025, thereby restoring GW-9/2018 for its No. 1724 of 2025 came to be preferred at the instance of Chanderwati from the proceedings arising out of GW16/2018 against the order dated 05.12.2024, wherein notice of motion has been issued and the same is pending for 20.09.2025 before ll the parties, who are sons and daughters of deceased Uday Singh and brothers and sisters of Bhagat Singh have arrived at a concurrence that all the three cases can be disposed of at this stage awaiting the final outcome of the abovementioned two petitions i.e. GW order, following two petitions were came eer Singh, Randhir Singh and Naresh Kumar against Mahipal and other official respondents which is pending for 16/2018 titled as Chanderwati Vs. Mahipal under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC came to be filed at the instance of Mahipal son of Uday Singh owever, aggrieved thereof, FAO No.518 of 2025 was filed from the proceedings arising out of GW- came to be allowed by this Court vide its 9/2018 for its No. 1724 of 2025 came to be preferred at the instance of Chanderwati from the proceedings arising out of GW16/2018 against the order dated 05.12.2024, wherein notice of motion has been issued and the same is pending for 20.09.2025 before ll the parties, who are sons and daughters of deceased Uday Singh and brothers and sisters of Bhagat Singh have arrived at a concurrence that all the three cases can be disposed of at this stage s i.e. GW- SANJAY GUPTA 2025.08.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3110 8. release of the compensation amount which even otherwise stands guarded under the orders passed by this Court on 21.02.2017 in CWP No. 3110 of 2017. 9. of Bhagat Singh, at this stage. outcome of the above mentioned two petitions i.e. GW 16/2018. 10. by learned counsel for respondent No.4 that the compensation payable to Bhagat with Canara Bank, Vikas Sadan, Shanti Nagar, 2019. Thus, passed by this Court, the interest accrued on the aforesaid deposit Mahipal son of Uday S residing since long. 11. disposed of. 26.08.2025 sanjay 3110-2017 (O&M) & 2 others [ Moreover, the prayer in the three petitions is with respect to release of the compensation amount which even otherwise stands guarded under the orders passed by this Court on 21.02.2017 in CWP No. 3110 of 2017. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by brothers and sisters of Bhagat Singh, all the three abovementioned at this stage. However, the parties shall remain bound by the final outcome of the above mentioned two petitions i.e. GW At this stage, it has been brought to the notice of this Court by learned counsel for respondent No.4 that the compensation payable to Bhagat Singh Canara Bank, Vikas Sadan, Shanti Nagar, 2019. Thus, with a trivial modification of the order dated 21.02.2017 passed by this Court, a direction is issued to the concerned Bank that the interest accrued on the aforesaid deposit pal son of Uday Singh, admittedly with whom Bhagat Singh is residing since long. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? [4] Moreover, the prayer in the three petitions is with respect to release of the compensation amount which even otherwise stands guarded under the orders passed by this Court on 21.02.2017 in CWP iew of the aforesaid stand taken by brothers and sisters all the three abovementioned petitions are disposed of he parties shall remain bound by the final outcome of the above mentioned two petitions i.e. GW-9/2017 and GW At this stage, it has been brought to the notice of this Court by learned counsel for respondent No.4 that the amount of ingh has already been deposited Canara Bank, Vikas Sadan, Shanti Nagar, Gurugram in the year with a trivial modification of the order dated 21.02.2017 a direction is issued to the concerned Bank that the interest accrued on the aforesaid deposits be released in favour of ingh, admittedly with whom Bhagat Singh is Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No Moreover, the prayer in the three petitions is with respect to release of the compensation amount which even otherwise stands guarded under the orders passed by this Court on 21.02.2017 in CWP iew of the aforesaid stand taken by brothers and sisters petitions are disposed of he parties shall remain bound by the final 7 and GW- At this stage, it has been brought to the notice of this Court amount of deposited Gurugram in the year with a trivial modification of the order dated 21.02.2017 a direction is issued to the concerned Bank that be released in favour of ingh, admittedly with whom Bhagat Singh is Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2025.08.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document