Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73723 (BOM)

nanda vishnu gawali v. shri anand bhandari

CP/799/2025 · 2025-11-19

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

928 CONT. PETITION NO. 799 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CONT. PETITION NO. 799 OF 2025 IN WP/8523/2023 Nanda Vishnu Gawali VERSUS Shri Anand Bhandari … • Ms. Suvarna Milind Zaware, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. Pulkundwar Santosh Baburao, Advocate for Respondent (sole) … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 19th NOVEMBER, 2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. By order dated 14.09.2023, respondent was directed to verify the case of the petitioner as regards his eligibility for the grant of advance/additional increments in the light of the Government Resolution dated 31.10.1989 and, if the petitioner was found eligible, he was to be paid his legal dues within eight weeks from the date of the order. 2. Learned advocate for the respondent has placed on record copy of the order dated 14.12.2023, by which the petitioner is held ineligible for the advance/additional increments. 3. The said order is marked as ‘X’ for identification. komal kamble 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:32202-DB 928 CONT. PETITION NO. 799 OF 2025 4. In view of passing of this order, the respondent has complied with the directions. 5. Learned advocate for the petitioner disputes the order passed by the respondent on merits. We are not inclined to go into the merits of the order in exercise of contempt jurisdiction. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he may adopt appropriate remedy. 6. In view of the compliance of the order, Contempt Petition is disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 2/2