Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73722 (BOM)

SHUBHAM ALIAS BAHUBALI RAMDAS PARDHE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1443/2025 · 2025-11-19

Shri Mehroz K Pathan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

950 BA NO. 1443 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1443 OF 2025 Shubham Alias Bahubali Ramdas Pardhe VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra … • Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle, Advocate for Applicant • Mr. V. M. Kagne, APP for Respondent - State … CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. DATED : 19.11.2025 PER COURT : 1. After this Court was not inclined to entertain the second successive bail application, filed after the earlier bail application, was permitted to be withdrawn as this Court was not inclined to grant bail. It is informed by the learned APP that the trial has already commenced and eight witnesses have been examined. Hence, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in X Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.; 2024 (4) Crimes 537 (SC), once the Trial Court has commenced recording evidence and the prosecution has started examining its witnesses, the Courts should be loath to entertainthe bail applications of the accused. Jhs/ 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:31846 950 BA NO. 1443 OF 2025 2. Considering that the trial has already commenced and, as informed by the learned APP, eight witnesses have already been examined, the Trial Court shall make an endeavor to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible. 3. The application is disposed of accordingly. ( MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. ) Jhs/ 2/2