Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1571 of 2025
------
1. Mohan Singh, aged about 81 years, son of late Ayodhaya Singh
2. Sunita Devi, aged about 45 years, wife of late Kameshwar Singh
3. Anand Singh, aged about 26 years, son of Sudeshwar Singh All are resident of Village-Banri @ Badi, P.O. & P.S.- Manika, Dist.-Latehar … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 07.03.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Manika P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 3(5)/109/115(2)/118(1)/127(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the alleged injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is then submitted that from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner no.2 filed Complaint Case No. 646 of 2024 in the court of A.C.J.M., Latehar and there was free fight between the parties. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and
further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Latehar, in connection with Manika P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not will annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-