Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RP NO.358 OF 2016 IN WP(C)No.4236 of 2016 1 2025:KER:26897 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 358 OF 2016 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.02.2016 IN WPC NO.4236 OF 2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C): 1 THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 507. 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER KANJIRAPPALLY VILLAGE KANJIRAPPALLY, PIN-686 507.
BY SRI.SUNILKUMAR KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN WP(C) :
T.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFA, S/O.P.P.SEYED MUHAMMED THENMACKAL HOUSE, KANJIRAPPALLY P.O., KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 507.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ANZAR BASHEER SRI.BABU CHERUKARA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP NO.358 OF 2016 IN WP(C)No.4236 of 2016 2 2025:KER:26897 O R D E R This Court only directed the Village Officer to take a decision in the light of Ext.P4 communication. Needless to say, the transfer can only be effected if the petitioner is eligible to transfer the registry of the property in accordance with the law. Accordingly, the review petition is disposed of with the above clarification. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE rkj